🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts about that comments made by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a narrative, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to beat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aim for the achievement; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the drought of US winners in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class serve and concussive power on each forehand and reverse side are more than adequate to defeat most opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, he is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising quickness and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

The American has made a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of American men lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

The American star made a career-best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, extending the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a terrible service game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to the sky. He extended the contest twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The match was fairly ironclad evidence that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were expecting the American to prevail, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, more so than virtually anyone on the ATP aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Group

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I don’t do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of winning a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {